9

Our Front Porch: How Can Atlanta Develop New Art Collectors?

Written By Baxter Jones on December 6, 2011 in Our Front Porch

.

A potential collector inspects a sculpture by Takashi Murakami at the 2010 FIAC international art fair in Paris. Photo by Baxter Jones.

The idea for BURNAWAY originated from a front-porch conversation about the need for more dialogue about local art. Please welcome Baxter Jones, this month’s curator of Our Front Porch, a series of guest reviews and topics for open discussion with you, our readers.

“Why don’t the wealthy people of Atlanta buy more handsome pictures? A few handsome houses have some enchanting treasures of art, but there are many palaces here built of stone and brick, furnished with velvet carpets, curtained with plush and satin and lace, ornately frescoed, rich in the possession of glass, silver and china, and yet without a worthy picture adorning the walls of a single room.”
The Atlanta Constitution, September 16, 1890

As the quote above suggests, the lack of a large community of serious collectors in Atlanta is not a new issue. Prompted by the closing of two of the city’s best galleries, an insightful article last month on ArtsCriticATL noted: “The art world is an interdependent system of artists, collectors, galleries, museums, government and the press. Like the engine in your car, when one piston goes out, the whole thing sputters.” Given my experiences, I thought I’d pose a series of questions about the Atlanta art world from the perspective of a collector.

Where do collectors come from? What factors go into making someone an art collector? And how do we get more of them involved in the local arts community? Anyone who occasionally buys a piece at a neighborhood festival is in a sense a collector, but, for purposes of this article, I’ll focus on those who spend significant amounts of time, effort, and resources buying works by professional artists.

One way to become a collector is to accumulate a pile of money and then hire a consultant to advise you on what to buy. That works for some people, but the model I’m thinking of is different: someone forms their own taste, over time, from looking, reading, talking with other interested people, and then looking some more. A range of elements can influence a collector: family, education, travel, friends who collect, gallerists, artists, and critical journalism. And it helps to have a certain level of resources and/or a talent for spotting good work before it is widely appreciated.

My thinking on these issues has been stimulated by reading Edmund de Waal’s wonderful The Hare with Amber Eyes (click here for Jerry Cullum’s review for BURNAWAY last year). In the course of this family history that doubles as social history, the author meditates on the origins of the collecting habits of his ancestor Charles Ephrussi: “This journey [through Italy] turns Charles into a collector. Or perhaps, I think, it allows him to collect, to turn looking into having and having into knowing …. Charles learns to spend time with a picture. He has been and looked, you feel, and then gone back and looked again.” That’s a good way to start.

In my own case, my parents were a major influence. My mother was a serious painter with an MFA from the Art Institute of Chicago. They began collecting in their early forties—shortly before they died in the 1962 Orly crash (click here for Paul Boshears’s thoughtful essay from last week). I realized recently that I was around that same age when I started collecting with some regularity. We lost some of the most promising collectors of that generation on that day in 1962.

My “second parents,” my aunt and uncle who raised me from age five, took me to museums often, as I now take my daughter. I benefited, more than I realized at the time, from the superb art history department at Emory. Later, when I studied in Europe for a year, I visited some of the world’s great museums as often as possible.

The next step toward becoming a collector involved visiting galleries, mostly in Atlanta. This city has been blessed over the past 25 years with some model gallery owners. Dedicated to advancing the careers of their artists, these are the ones who take the time to educate collectors (including those who come in and look for years before ever buying anything). Over the years I’ve bought a significant number of works by Atlanta artists. And when I purchased work by out-of-town artists who have New York galleries, I found a slightly better price by buying here. Local collectors who aren’t getting to know Atlanta’s galleries are just being foolish.

And when it comes to material that simply isn’t available here (in my case, surrealist drawings, mostly from the 1930s and ’40s), Atlanta galleries have been gracious and helpful in steering me to the best New York dealers.

But, in order for me to make those early visits to Atlanta galleries, I had to know about them. And I needed some encouragement to actually go. I found this motivation in my local newspaper, which featured frequent, prominently placed, well-written reviews (thank you Cathy Fox, Jerry Cullum, and others). This brings me to my greatest concern about where the future art collectors of Atlanta will come from: what happens when the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the media institution with the greatest reach, almost abandons art criticism?

It’s true that there are still some reviews published in the AJC, but they are fewer and harder to find, especially online. The one remaining regular arts reporter, Howard Pousner, does a good job given the overall editorial policy, but the effect is a bit like the Last Legionnaire at Fort Zinderneuf. For a contrasting example of how vigorous arts journalism can still exist at a newspaper in a similarly sized city, check out the website of the Denver Post.

For those of us who already know we are interested in the arts, there is BURNAWAY, ArtsCriticATL, and some other online sources, and many of us subscribe to magazines such as ART PAPERS, Artforum, ARTnews, and so on. Atlanta Art Now, whose first volume Noplaceness has just come out, is a promising resource.

But what about those who don’t yet know that they would be interested, those who have no idea what Atlanta offers? Far too many recent arrivals seem quick to absorb the mindless “there’s no culture here” myth, and many budding collectors accept the notion that one has to buy from galleries elsewhere.

Not that Atlanta is as unique in this respect as we may believe. A recent article in The Art Newspaper discussed why Miami’s art market remains small despite Art Basel Miami Beach and the presence of some fine collectors: “[Miami’s situation] is not unusual–in most cities the major collectors travel to develop relationships with the best galleries and artists nationally and internationally. It is usually the levels of collectors underneath who emerge, and who sustain and develop local markets–and these new collectors can take years to develop. This is a process that is happening gradually in Miami.”

It’s happening gradually in Atlanta and other cities, too. But it’s the word “gradually” that’s tough on gallery owners and artists.

My questions for BURNAWAY’s Front Porch:

How do we reach those who are not yet involved in the arts? How do we attract new patrons–some of whom may over time develop into significant collectors–given the lack of sustained arts coverage by major media?

Which comes first, more collectors or more galleries? That is, how do we foster a “virtuous circle” of expanding audiences for art?

What is the relevance of museum exhibits and permanent collections in developing a better community of collectors?

Constructive suggestions, please.


Baxter Jones is a native Atlantan who practices copyright and trademark law. He has served in the past on the boards of the Atlanta Contemporary Art Center, Horizon Theatre, and PushPush Theater. He is currently on the board of the High Museum and Théâtre du Rêve. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent any organization.


Please feel free to participate in the open comments underneath this article, or share it elsewhere and discuss informally with your friends. Talking in person counts!

Our Front Porch is a series inviting guest contributors to share thoughts on local art for open discussion with you, our readers. Check back after the holidays for new surprises!


Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

Category: Our Front Porch |

  • http://www.continentcontinent.cc/ paul boshears

    I’m so glad you wrote this, Baxter—and thank you for your kind words about my writing. Nell Ruby and the folks at Agnes Scott have an outstanding model I suggest be widely-emulated.

    For the past several years they have allotted a certain amount of money to their senior students (these monies came to their program when they sold an item from their collection). Each senior class is then charged with growing the school’s collection by purchasing works at shows here in Atlanta. They have looked to ART PAPERS’ Annual Art Auction for excellent contemporary art works(full disclosure: I am currently working as a contractor for Art Papers, Inc.) The school benefits in a couple of ways from this: 1) they acquire more art, 2) in so doing they also have an excellent assessment tool for the quality of their program.

    In conversations with Nell and other arts educators from the Atlanta-area universities I’ve learned that there is a significant distance separating the BFA/BA arts programs around Atlanta and the actual artists and arts institutions. In those conversations with some of the City’s arts educators it’s been suggested that there be something like a campus liaison between student groups and arts organizations in the area.

    I went to the recent Telephone Factory Lofts art event at the urging of friends from another part of the Metro-area and there I realized we have a good problem in Atlanta: we have plenty of people buying art at festivals like Dogwood, Inman Park, or at the Telephone Factory—but those buyers aren’t aware of publications like Burnaway or Art Papers. I’ll admit my sample was small and the method unscientific, but across the board the people that I spoke with had not heard of the most significant platforms of art conversation in the city. Here’s a market not yet captured.

    Sure, it costs more (in terms of time invested) to learn about who’s doing what in Atlanta through forging new relationships, but the pay-off has got to be better for the patrons, right? This conversation-making problem is properly the purview of arts publications.

    Arts publications make arts publics.

    If we are interested in developing the next generation of arts patrons, we must reinvigorate our commitments to promoting dialogue between the uninitiated and those that drink the art kool-aid.

  • http://muckrakelabs.blogspot.com jason

    if i was a wealthy person with only limited interest or knowledge in art/collecting, i might find it interesting to see/hear the stories of other collectors who also may not have been the most arts-educated folks prior to their collecting…

    education is key. once upon a time a long time ago i made a decent pocket of change by selling things, from puppies to cars to health club memberships to quarters or eighths or ounces… and in every case, my success was always linked to my ability to inform clients’ knowledge base about my particular product – without waiting for them to ask, but also without being the kind of salesperson who hassles and harangues. in short, turning a slight spark of curiosity into the more real committment of ownership.

    that said, i do know that salesmanship is not a talent everyone who deigns to sell art, or anything for that matter, has.

    i will and do walk right out of any shop, even if i do/did go in seeking to buy something, if i get too pressed by sales people.

    i also know artists whose blatant “salesmanship” and networking attempts and approach in general is really really repulsive, even if i understand and get where they’re coming from.

    i don’t think it’s the artist’s place to be the one who has to do the sales pitch. in fact, i find it really has a horrible effect on my ability to appreciate their work. yes it’s a business. so is sports. but i don’t expect, and wouldn’t want, players of a sports team that i follow to be the ones selling tickets to games, i’d want them training and playing their best. same with artists.

    and yes, i get that some artists seek to knowingly and ironically use the commercial aspects in their work. speaking from personal attempts/successes/failure at that very exercise, i just find that is often way too meta, and way too done, unless done extremely extremely well.

    anyway, it’s the gallerist/dealer who is to fill the gap between artist and collector. to be the one from whom you buy your ticket to ride the great ride of art. it’s the artists’ job to design the ride. if, as an artist, i am burdened by having to sell tickets, the ride could be less than it should be, even possibly defective, and that’s a liability that would hurt everyone involved.

    to advance an area’s collecting, and/or reputation, it is the gallerists and dealers who must best understand their role, leaving artists to cope with understanding theirs.

    and then they also have to face the same bittersweet dilemma we all in art must face: that art by its very nature is such a subjective thing, that divining value and direction is impossible to formulize. that standards still matter, even if they must be set on a case-by-case basis.

    if i was a wealthy person, i’d be attracted by stories of others similar to me, who took such a leap, and survived…

  • http://www.terridilling.com/ Terri Dilling

    This comment in regards to AJC: I recently sent a complaint that they have no ARTS category on their website menu (although they do have Music, Movies, Fashion, Dining, etc.) It is a big disservice to the city to not include the Arts. Though arts coverage has decreased, the AJC does still publish an Arts section in print, but they don’t make it available online like the other sections. Maybe others can join me in an email campaign asking them to make it available on the web?
    contact: listen@ajc.com

  • Johannes de Silentio

    Demand precedes supply, which then grows to meet it. Invigorating a market means finding, or more likely, creating demand.

    How astonishing, then, is the art world, which puts supply before demand! Galleries, museums, and the press all proclaim something’s value, prior to anyone who is unconnected with this valuation expressing demand.

    It is a marvelous sleight-of-hand, isn’t it?

    Here are some ways to stoke demand, all tactics tried and true:

    1) Utilize, as much as possible, abstract and religious justifications for demand (that art answers some great need, that every culture needs art, that art expresses deep ideas about the human condition, etc.); elaborate collatoral material is also useful. 2) Marshall vitriol and specious logic against those who seek to undercut your claim that such-and-such object is worthwhile, or who claim that things other than your own are MORE worthwhile.
    3) Praise most highly that which is of material value and able to be sold.
    4) Seek to align your claims with history, with traditions and objects with which there are no real connections.
    5) Seek to become counselors in matters of taste to the wealthy and powerful.

    The last point is crucial: if you sell a widget to an individual that is good, but if you sell a widget to the owner of a chain of stores, and then that person sells it to many individuals, that is so much better.

    With art, influence alone is a kind of selling, and the influence of the wealthy and powerful is of supreme importance.

  • BPJ

    I think that what Joseph Brodsky wrote of poetry is true for the visual arts as well: “When it comes to poetry, the net result of market research, for all its computers, is distinctly medieval….For in cultural matters, it is not demand that creates supply, it is the other way around. You read Dante because he wrote the Divine Comedy, not because you felt the need for him: you would not have been able to conjure either the man or the poem.” (“An Immodest Proposal” 1991)

  • Jeremy Abernathy

    I’ve been really enjoying these Front Porch series, so it’s great to see that others are as well. Thanks for participating!

    Note: Baxter Jones comments under the initials “BPJ” so if you see those here (or on any number of websites), then you know it’s him. Sorry, Baxter, for “outing” your call sign! :- )

    @ Paul -
    A liaison with universities is something that’s much needed. I’m happy to see faculty like Craig Drennen (GSU) and Rich Gere (SCAD) going out to venues and talking up partnerships. I know there are many other professors who are active in the outside world, but it would be nice to have a lot more crossover between our schools and public art spaces.

    Of course, it’s easy to lay blame on colleges when, really, partnerships can easily start from the outside. The Noplaceness symposium at Emory is a prime example. I’d encourage any working artist or arts group to start chatting up professors to see where it goes. You may not find an open door right away, but you’d be surprised that there are university employees who are hungry to have someone use their spaces for programs and/or work together on projects.

    @ Baxter -
    I’m glad you brought up Miami and its collections. There are several significant private collections in Atlanta that could become a great resource for encouraging people to learn more about art. Susannah and I were speaking about that yesterday, and I think it’s a good idea to locate some of these people and engage them with working artists and young collectors. Yes, there’s already been movement in that direction, but I think it’s important to keep these goals on the radar.

    Here’s a question for you. You’ve mentioned your involvement with the performing arts – isn’t there a way to encourage patrons of the theatres to mingle with the visual arts, and vice versa? Do you think there’s potential for that, and what do you think it would take?

  • http://www.rociorodriguez.net Rocio Rodriguez

    Great quote by Brodsky Baxter. Thank you for your thoughtful column I hope others read it. Is there an art collector’s grp in Atlanta? I don’t mean consultants taking people around galleries/studios but actually a grp of art collectors that know each other and share info?

  • Jeremy Abernathy

    Nice question, Rocio.

    Just remembered this from the Creative Time report. It has a section on collectors.
    Full text here:
    http://frontrow.dmagazine.com/2011/02/building-a-thriving-artistic-community/

    Several pages down, list of recommendations for growing the arts:

    “3. Great patrons who support the creation, presentation, and acquisition of art

    … …

    – Think big and small. Small and medium-sized organizations need your support, too. These organizations are the stepping-stones for artists between the studio and the museum, and are where careers are launched. Support initiatives that advance the capacity and caliber of these organizations and spread the word about their importance.

    – Support new commissions and experimental work.

    – Support institutional innovation to ensure that Dallas organizations stay relevant, ambitious, and connected with broader audiences.

    – Support opportunities for local artists to advance their work through travel grants, residencies, and prizes.

    – Support programs and initiatives that encourage curators and art­ists from other places to come visit artists and institutions in Dallas, and Dallas curators and artists to travel outside of the region.

    – Buy local. If you like an artist’s work don’t just purchase from NY or LA galleries, also purchase from local galleries.

    – Mentor new generations of patrons and collectors. Collectors should play a role in the nurturing of new collectors. Guide young and prospective collectors through studio visits, gallery tours, and museum events. Take art trips with friends, acquain­tances, and family members.”

  • http://www.rociorodriguez.net Rocio Rodriguez

    Thanks for posting the Creative Time report Jeremy. I saw some parallels with ATL and also saw that some of the things that are being suggested by Creative Time are already starting to happen here. But there is still a lot to be done. Sometimes we think our problems are unique. They aren’t. It was also interesting to read the comments made by some, below the report.