10

Our Front Porch: Can Artists Help Heal Atlanta’s Divided Community?

Written By Lisa Tuttle on October 4, 2011 in Our Front Porch

The idea for BURNAWAY originated from a front-porch conversation about the need for more dialogue about local art. Please welcome Lisa Tuttle, the first guest curator of Our Front Porch, a new series presenting topics for open discussion with you, our readers.

Why are you here in Atlanta?

For me, it’s because this is where I’ve chosen to live and where I’ve been since the late ’70s. When I came out of school, New York seemed too big, expensive, dangerous, and unmanageable. Having grown up in Charlotte, North Carolina, I found Atlanta’s Southernness familiar, but it was larger, urban, and more progressive with pockets of sophistication that suited me. There were foreign films, museums, a noticeably diverse middle class, and contemporary art. Atlanta was big enough not only to have an arts community, but several alternative arts communities. Art seemed to move bottom up, rather than only top down. There’s a remarkable, sometimes messy, cultural ecology that continues to evolve here, and I am encouraged by the flourishing energy, critical attention, and productivity in today’s local art scene.

Once I commented to Chicago curator Mary Jane Jacob that it was hard making contemporary art in Atlanta, and she responded that it’s hard anywhere, so why not get on with it? Bloom where you’re planted, and all that.

John Barth’s The Floating Opera is an appropriate metaphor for how I’ve experienced Atlanta’s art history: seeing only part of the play as it floats by the river’s bank. So many things have disappeared, but have left me with their mark: the Atlanta College of Art, the Neighborhood Arts Center, Mattress Factory shows, the Fulton Bag Mill and other artist-initiated exhibitions, Blue Rat Gallery, Nexus Contemporary Art Center on Ralph McGill Boulevard (the gallery, theatre, studios, and press, as well as the early Atlanta Biennales, artists’ books, and all those art parties), the site works and performances at the Arts Festival of Atlanta in and outside Piedmont Park (billboards, MARTA projects, City Site Works, Art in Odd Places, Conversations at the Castle, and Changing Spaces), City Hall East, Crystal Britton, David Heath, Genevieve Arnold, Judith Alexander, countless commercial galleries …  and the list goes on. If it weren’t such a huge, tedious task, I’d write my own history of art in Atlanta. But then maybe someone will edit and publish the collected works of Dr. Jerry Cullum … .

To my fellow Atlanta artists, I would ask: Does the art we make ultimately matter, and does it matter over time? And, if so, to whom? Must each generation reinvent the wheel? A few years back, I was relieved to learn that there was going to be a Museum of Contemporary Art of Georgia (MOCA GA). I worried that we had no recorded history outside of the ephemeral reviews in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and ART PAPERS. MOCA GA is a collecting institution, and its Education Resource Center keeps documentation on numerous Georgia artists. This record keeping is vital for all of us—both emerging and established artists—if we want our work to be part of an ongoing history and not disappear into anecdotal amnesia.

Looking back over the years, I can see that the energy of the arts community is what has made Atlanta an interesting place to live. In particular, the projects that were started by artists have been the most meaningful: Nexus, Art in Odd Places, TABOO, Shedspace, Eyedrum, the Mattress Factory shows, and other artist-initiated efforts come to mind.

So, here are my questions for BURNAWAY’s Front Porch that I hope will elicit some good conversation:

1. What connects us? What divides us? Importantly, even now, why do we continue to be divided racially?

2. What is our continuity with the past? Is continuity necessary and why?

3. As artists, how can we cultivate more connection among and across our various communities?

Lisa Tuttle is an artist, curator, writer, arts advocate, and arts administrator currently working for Fulton County’s Public Art Program. Her own public artwork, Harriet Rising, created in collaboration with poet Alice Lovelace, is currently on view as part of Elevate: Art Above Underground. She believes public art can be a creative form of public service, and making art is her way of thinking about the world. She is represented as an artist by Sandler Hudson Gallery, and her studio is located at the Arts Exchange.


Please feel free to participate in the open comments underneath this article, or share it elsewhere and discuss informally with your friends. Talking in person counts!

For those who’d like to be a little more official, we are extending an open call for contributors to this month’s topic. Please read the following guidelines and email our editor at jeremy@burnaway.org if you have any questions.

Submission Guidelines [Updated: 10/5/2011]

Please label all emails with “Our Front Porch” in the subject line. Submissions should address the current month’s topic and should respond to the questions contained in our guest curator’s prompt. Responses should be specific, avoid tangents, and be honest but always constructive. If you’d prefer to address your thoughts to someone specific, feel free to begin this month’s letter with “Dear Lisa Tuttle.”

BURNAWAY will publish at least three short responses next Tuesday. Please try to keep these down to 400 words in length. Short responses are due Sunday, October 9, 2011.

If 400 words sounds way too short, we also are calling for one long response that we will publish at the end of the month. Long responses are due Tuesday, October 25, 2011.

Our Front Porch is a new experiment for our publication, so please send your feedback on how we can improve the format in the future!


Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

Category: Our Front Porch |
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://www.anitasartscool.com Anita Stewart

    What connects us? Benefits/Detriments to all.
    What divides us ?
    How to take action to stop the detriments and increase the benefits.
    Continuing the past is important but it must change as well. Without change there is no growth.
    Artist connecting across communities.
    We have started a new organization called Gwinnett Art Works.. We had a town hall meeting of performing artists, writers, painters,etc.It was very beneficial to help us brainstorm on how to help each other. I suggest a similar organization to help artists interact with each other and form subgroups to assist in specific areas.

  • Jeremy Abernathy

    Dear Lisa,

    Thank you so much for writing this. I can hear the warmth in your descriptions of so many galleries, projects, and people who have come and gone, and those who have persevered, during your time in Atlanta over the past 30 years. We are honored that you have loaned us your voice. :-)

    For everyone else, I realize now that it might help if I would write some context about the conversation leading up to today. There are several nuances to your letter above. For example, you wrote, “Must each generation reinvent the wheel?” This sounds a lot like a question that I had in mind when we first approached you.

    This weekend Dashboard Co-op is putting up another show on Edgewood, and it was just last weekend that Ponce Crush galleries had another round of openings. When I go to events like these, I can’t but smile at the tenacity, persistence, and resourcefulness of the artists in my generation of 20-somethings.

    Some of us have reached out to the older generation to seek advice. Jerry Cullum, for instance, helped me get my start at criticism. Susan Bridges, Louise Shaw, Robert Cheatham, and so many others — they have been invaluable in connecting me to the ongoing effort that is Atlanta art, instead of it always feeling like you’re the first astronaut landing on the moon. It’s an overstated myth that the younger generation doesn’t speak the same language.

    But, still, these efforts have been only a trickle, where it should be like a mighty river, not unlike the one in the Floating Opera you mentioned in your note, but possibly with more rapids and water falls. Yes, there should be more continuity with the past!

    So that’s all to say that this stemmed out of conversations about inter-generational divisions. But, now that I see your complete list of questions, it’s so much more: racial divisions, cultural and class and geographic divisions, divisions between generations, divisions within a generation (because no group is truly homogeneous, ever) artistic divisions between genres and types of art, music, and so on.

    But I at least wanted to preserve that initial motive, so that readers will know where we’re coming from, as well as where we hope the conversation will go.

    Thanks again, Lisa. You’re the best!

    Yours truly,

    Jeremy Abernathy
    Editor-in-Chief
    BURNAWAY

  • http://www.ocaatlanta.com Eddie Granderson

    Lisa,
    It was great strolling down memory lane as you highlighted many of the periods in Atlanta’s art history that I remember. Your history with this arts community exceeds mine but it intertwines quite a bit as you know.

    As an African American, an artist and admiistrator in this community, my experiences have been somewhat different than yours. There of course is the love for the city and the great community of individuals in this city, most of which have been artists, that I’ve experienced.

    Much like your decision, I made an intentional commitment to Atlanta. I have always considered myself fortunate, blessed, to have been provided a career in the arts in Atlanta.

    When I was given an opprtunity to start-up a new intiative for the City, that occasion resulted in City Gallery East. Over the four years that I directed the gallery the experiences provided an array of opportuities that impacted the cultural scene in Atlanta. I could write a book about my many experience that resulted from City Gallery East. When given the opportunity to impact the City through management, I worked to energize a failing interest in public art and gave structure to the Public Art Program. I hope to end my career with the city on a high note and the opportunity to identify and develop such opportunities as “Elevate/ Art Above Underground” for a new generation of artists is exciting.

    My positive experiences has far exceeded the negative but unfortunately the froth of racial undertones made my experience different than yours.

    As you know before signing on with the City of Atlanta, my work as an artists was deeply rooted in exposing race and class bigotry. Atlanta was an ideal location for this work because of its history and racial make-up. Your giving me an opportunity to culminate my ideas as a curator during the Atlanta Arts festival resulted in the exhibition “The Language of Force” which was key to the folks at the then Bureau of Cultural Affairs, asking me to direct a gallery at City Hall East.

    I felt strongly – due to race and class struggles in Atlanta – that City Gallery East focus on bringing opportunity to outstanding artists that were marginalized in the art scene in Atlatna, the region and indeed the nation.

    As manager of visual art programs which included not only City Gallery East but also Chastain gallery and public art, I saw that there was a racial profile for the “white” Chastain gallery and the “Black” City Gallery East which I worked to dispell.

    When we decided to realign our management so that Public Art would be strengthened to reflect the interest of the community, it was a up hill battle within City government and amongst the community to change the perceptions of race and class to utilize public art as a tool for community building.

    Sadley the divide continues today but I do see a new and brighter future within the community of artists and individuals that are the make-up of Atlanta’s Art community. Let’s hope that the future continues to brighten for this new generation.

  • http://www.rociorodriguez.net Rocio Rodriguez

    Thank you Lisa and Jeremy for the comments above. In regards to one of Lisa’s questions “why do we continue to be divided racially?” that is a huge question that transcends the contemporary art community. To answer that question requires more questions to be asked and a discussion that goes beyond this format. Maybe someone else can tackle it.
    Many, many years ago when I was teaching at a univ. in Ohio we had a visiting artist from NYC that at the start of his artist talk said that he woke up in Cleveland every morning thinking about NYC and decided that why live in Cleveland if all he thought about was NYC. So he moved there. This comment has always stayed with me because I thought it very important in terms of where one chooses to live, be an artist. A number of us that have been here for a long time (more than 25 yrs.) have chosen Atlanta as our place to be. What brought us here were different things but we have remained here and have seen a lot of things come and go (as Lisa described above). One thing that I think is crucial to this discussion is for artists as a whole to embrace and respect the place where they are—here. I am heartened by all the new activity that has erupted as of late (last 5 years) and how engaged the younger community is creating new venues for contemporary art in this city. (I am aware though that some galleries that were important venues to this community have closed and this is troubling). In regards to being here, I don’t live with my head stuck in the sand and in my studio all of the time. I travel, I read, I spend hours on the internet looking at things and learning about what is going on elsewhere. I choose to be here because I can make my work here in relative peace. Which means I can afford to live here, I can afford a great studio, and Delta is always ready. The downside to all this as it is in many communities that are the size of Atlanta is that once you have been here for a while the opportunities to move vertically are few, and this gets back to the size of the city, the general audience that is here, and the entire ecosystem of what sustains a so called ‘artworld’ yes, things are lacking but that’s the trade off to have other things. To address one of Lisa’s questions— What connects us is contemporary art and what divides us in my humble opinion is generational–meaning what I am interested in isn’t exactly what a 25 yr. old artist is interested in, and I think that is a good thing not a bad thing. I think the mix of young, middle age, old is very important and I strive for this in relationships with others in my own life. Often I talk to newcomers and they have no clue as to what has gone on here before. I ask myself how important is that? Would it change anything? For one thing it could change the way people feel about this city and maybe start to ‘own’ it. I often find that this is a very transient place, people come do their thing and they move on. Other people come and bring with them great energy and openess or one person’s involvement in the community changes the dynamic within the entire community. (see Louis Corrigan and Michael Rooks). I find that those that don’t think constantly about other artworlds and wishing they were there, have more impact in this community than those that come and only see Atlanta as a stopover to another opportunity/job. I find that there is a certain insecurity here not only among artists but also with others involved in the community that suffer from that very provincial attitude that to be good you have to leave or be shown in a major art center (don’t misunderstand me– I think it is crucial to show one’s work elsewhere and find new audiences for the work–it’s important to engage in dialogue outside of the immediate). And I find thankfully, that a number of younger artists that are here today want to make it happen here not ‘over there’. Maybe its their youth, but I feel there is a different attitude and perhaps this is because today you can be anywhere when you turn on your computer, and our world is the entire world not just one place thus Atlanta feels more connected to elsewhere than it ever was before. One good thing that I feel these days is that I go to an opening and I don’t know 50% of the people there…that in itself tells me the community has grown. But the downside of that is that those that are new here know not much of what, and who, has done important things here and laid the foundation of some of the institutions here. Some would be surprised to learn who was exhibited here 20,25 years ago that today have major ‘artworld reputations’ . My point here is, that there has always been a number of people here that haven’t been stopped from doing, creating, promoting, expanding, supporting this art community. Those people ‘own’ the place where they live, they aren’t interlopers. They are knowlegable and they are committed. These are the people that actually create something and make things happen. How important is it for us to be connected? Maybe being ‘connected’ isn’t what is important maybe feeling grounded and creating a sense of ownership about how we feel about our community is more important. Afterall, when you own something you tend to care for it and respect it.

  • http://www.rociorodriguez.net Rocio Rodriguez

    Eddie, I was busy writing before I read your post. Thank you for your perspective. RR

  • Jerry Cullum

    I have been too busy writing art reviews to reply to this thread of comments. Much as I appreciate Lisa’s compliment re my collected writings, much of my reviewing career before the brief stint with Access Atlanta was necessarily limited to commercial gallery shows. Cathy usually did the museums, and apart from my reviews and other people’s feature stories in Art Papers, the alternative spaces were scarcely covered at all. I felt singularly privileged to have my own alternative space shows (and Mattress Factory artwork) written about by Cathy Fox.

    So, yes, a history of art in Atlanta needs to be written, and apparently more than one person is embarking on the project, so maybe we need a panel discussion as a preliminary to sharing the labor. I seem to be a bit too overwhelmed with keeping up with what’s happening right now to devote more than a fraction of my time to what happened in 1985, much less in 1965 before I arrived on the scene. (Doctoral programs being what they are, I didn’t really begin to explore much beyond Emory until the advent of suddenly explosive dance and poetry and music and art scene that burst forth circa 1977. I had spent much of the previous postdoctoral year helping edit an art-and-politics anthology compiled by an art professor at the college in Florida where I did my undergraduate degree, so I was way out of touch.)

    Eddie Granderson’s reply brings back memories of the Olympic-year Art in Atlanta exhibition that Tina Dunkley and I co-curated for international distribution. Our cultural-affairs liaison in Magdeburg singled out Eddie’s portraits of homeless men sleeping under newspapers as the work that spoke most to the condition of the former East Germany circa 1996.

    So, let’s keep the conversation going, including why apart from a very few artists and galleries there are almost no situations that attract more than one of Atlanta’s now multiple ethnic and art communities. The shows at Connexion Gallery, for example, brought out a multiracial art community I hadn’t known existed, but only from nearby neighborhoods outside the perimeter.

  • http://www.arturolindsay.com Arturo Lindsay

    Familia,

    I just got home after a very long day of teaching culminating with a visit to Radcliffe Bailey’s studio where my students interviewed him for a monograph they must write for their final paper in our Contemporary Art Seminar class.

    Sadly, I am way too tired to go into my own studio.

    That said, I saw Lisa’s name on an email regarding her project for Elevate and just had to follow links that led me to her brilliant observations here.

    So Lisa, here is my 2 cents about staying in Atlanta. In part, it is artists like you and Eddie and Rocio and Radcliffe and Fahamu and of course critics like Jerry and artist/museum directors like Annette and many, many more. Yes, I would like to see us (artists and arts people) seeing each other and interacting with each other on a regular basis. What I miss most about New York and in particular the Lower East Side is that there are bars and cafes in close proximity that I can enter and run into artists, poets, musicians and curators ready to engage in very thought provoking ideas about art and ideas.

    Discussing the art community in Atlanta with my students today Radcliffe spoke in glowing terms. And I agree. However, what is missing is an area of town where we can count on casually walking into a bar/cafe and find like minded individuals. This is what artists thrived on in Paris, Munich, Berlin and Vienna at the birth of Modernism over 100 years ago.

    So Lisa, yes we have racial, gender, ethnic and many more social problems but frankly, as artists, we are all in the same damn leaky ass boat. Yes, some are on the upper decks and others in the galley. But it is the same leaky ass boat and we need each other to stay afloat and IF we are able to find common space where we can talk to each other regularly about art and ideas we can at least return to our studios invigorated and ready to make art. This type of exchange might indeed lead to an aesthetic that is truly characteristic of the city we call home.

    Mi querida Lisa – Thank you so very much for starting this conversation.

    Abrazos,

    Arturo

  • Lisa Tuttle

    Hi Jerry, thanks for replying (also to Eddie and Rocio as well!) I hope others may have responded directly to Jeremy also. I would like to comment that one of the reasons I have always been pleased to be a part of The Arts Exchange, despite many of our challenges over the years, is that it has seemed to be one of the few arts organizations in Atlanta that continues to be an interesting mix of ethnicities, art disciplines/practices and age groups. And, of course, there are artists in Atlanta these days from all over the world, and our… diversity is far from encyclopedic…But cultivating “…more situations that bring together our various art and artist communities”, not to mention our audiences, is definitely a conversation worth continuing…

  • Hannah Finnie

    Hi, I’m a student intern at the Emory Center for Ethics, and I wanted to share some of my thoughts.

    Art has always been deeply tied to social change, and it always will be. Rather than simply a canvas filled with color and lines, art consists of opinions, questions, and emotions. Thus, when we see an artist’s views depicted in their art, art becomes a driving force that prompts us to consider and evaluate our own values. By examining a piece of art and the message its artist is trying to convey, we respectively examine our own values and what we want to express through our values. This, I believe, is the true beauty of art. It is a means by which we can determine what is important to what we believe, and, accordingly, who we are.

    As I mentioned earlier, art and social change have always gone hand in hand. Why is this? I believe the answer lies in the fact that art inspires self-retrospection, thereby causing us to think about problems we never before considered, and to create opinions about issues to which we were previously apathetic. This, in turn, spurs social change. We connect through social change. When two people have the same fiery passion within themselves, their common passion will undeniably unite them. However, this passion does not necessarily manifest itself into the same opinion on how to solve said problem. This brings us to another question: is it the shared passion or the common opinion that brings us together? I believe it is the passion. Oftentimes, after participating in a passionate debate, I find that I feel just as connected to my sparring partner than had the other person taken the side position as I. Consequently, I think that it is the fact that two people care immensely about a subject, rather than holding the same opinion on that subject, that connects them.
    Conversely, it is apathy that divides us. If you have ever participated in a protest, distributed fliers, or even just tried to share your opinion; you know that there is no worse feeling than when someone walks by, passes you and without a doubt sees and hears you calling their attention, and then pretends to look at an imaginary watch on their wrist. If a cause is so critical to you that it almost defines who you are, but someone does not see the importance of that issue, and, consequently, is apathetic towards it, there is a divide. Relating directly back to art, a lack of art that stirs up emotions within generates divisions in our society.

    Therefore, I believe that art is the crucial core component to these connections, for it prompts us to question and develop our own beliefs, therefore creating the foundations of what is necessary for human connections, a common passion.

  • Pingback: ART: Local versus global and does it matter? | Victoria Webb - Furious Dreams. Painter, Designer, Activist