9

Plastic Aztecs build a cave at Beep Beep, but will they Grow?

Written By Karen Tauches on March 24, 2010 in Reviews

The Plastic Aztecs' installation covers the gallery's front windows and contains an enclosed space for visitors to walk inside. Photo courtesy the artists and Beep Beep Gallery.

The Plastic Aztecs' cave installation (visible in the reflection above) contains an enclosed space for visitors to walk inside. Photo courtesy the artists and Beep Beep Gallery.

Turner prize winner Roger Hiorns used chemicals that produce bright blue crystals to convert an entire abandoned apartment into an oceanic cave of gems. Roger Hiorns, Seizure, 2008. An Artangel/Jerwood Commission. Harper Road, London. Photo courtesy Corvi-Mora, London.

Turner prize winner Roger Hiorns used chemicals that produce bright blue crystals to convert an entire abandoned apartment into an oceanic cave of gems. Roger Hiorns, Seizure, 2008. An Artangel/Jerwood Commission. Harper Road, London. Photo courtesy Corvi-Mora, London.

Caves and crystals are in vogue; Lee Bul, Roger Hiorns, and even Atlanta’s Plastic Aztecs number among countless other artists—working in both high- and low-brow styles—that have joined the bandwagon. Why, in such a high-technology age, are we now so attracted to the mysterious mythology of unplugged darkness and geometric magic?

The Plastic Aztecs are a prolific artist collective that has produced three solo exhibitions in two short years throughout Atlanta’s low-brow gallery circuit, first at Eyedrum in 2008, then at MINT Gallery in 2009, and now in their show titled Grow, currently on view at Beep Beep Gallery. The current Aztecs roster includes Erin Basset, Becky Furey, Andrea Sanders, and Dorothy Stuck. Their work is fun, loose, and exudes a positive energy through a popular language of science-fiction environmentalism.

Though they call what they do installation, I’d say it’s more like an explosive, rambling collection of art objects creatively displayed in wonky salon-style arrangements. At this point in their early practice, it is acceptable to riff at this entry level of art-making for a while. There’s certainly an audience who enjoys it, as demonstrated by the hordes of youth who flocked to Beep Beep on opening night to support the collective’s work.

Aztecs-grow33

Andrea Sanders' mixed-media work is designed to grow, decompose, and fully biodegrade over time. Photo courtesy the artists and Beep Beep Gallery.

However, I think the Plastic Aztecs have what it takes to graduate to a higher level of practice, beyond the expectations of the Aurora Coffees of the world and the wild drunken group shows that are often the standard for that scene. This doesn’t mean they have to start selling more expensive work or employ tighter craftsmanship, or otherwise act like business professionals. With the exception of the paintings (which remind me of dated folk art and emphasize a more cutsey aesthetic), I like the style in which they construct things, and I’m curious to know if they make each work as a group or as individuals.

So, with this in mind, here is my critique. As mentioned above, caves, crystals, skulls, and neon rainbows have been in wide popular use in art for almost a decade now. Anyone who attends Art Basel in Miami will concur. These visual tropes are so ubiquitous that perhaps it’s no longer important that they are unoriginal: In hindsight, they convey a stylized, collective message from a majority of Aughties artists that embraces a particular romanticism of an earth-centric, sparkling green future. This generation wanted to include hand drawn animals, spirits, and triangulation à la Chris Johanson. I’m all for that, especially at a time when the real world was so chaotic in terms of weather, terrorism, and politics. But I do think the best artists will find a way to communication this theme in a deeper, more specific expression.

Aztecs-install-3

The Plastic Aztecs, Grow, installation view. Photo courtesy the artists and Beep Beep Gallery.

Ironically for an exhibition titled Grow, I think the show at Beep Beep should be edited down to the smartest works and displayed in a more considered installation environment. Objects can be gathered in overlapping groups while reserving empty spaces to allow viewers’ eyes to rest. For example, the wonderful web of cheap costume chains is a nice touch; it deserves more precious placement by itself and with ample lighting. That would put it in dramatic contrast to the most dominating object in the show: the cave installation, a nicely colored cardboard cubby with geometric peaks, positioned over the front window.1

What if the rest of the show was more closely related to the cave installation’s vibe, giving dominance to of the atmospherics of dark wet things? Then, the black and white wall drawings might become more than just decorative, and the mushrooms growing inside the white frames (a nice touch) would become more meaningful. While the AstroTurf patches on the floor were a decent attempt to address the ground level, the Plastic Aztecs probably needed to spray paint it black or a more contrasting color, because the turf’s green is lost on the cement. However, the 80s folk-art curiosity cabinet and T-shirts hung on the back wall? Those have got to go.

1 Korean artist Lee Bul made a fiberglass cave remarkably similar in size and shape; the work has been shown at venues including the famous Fondation Cartier and in New Orleans during Prospect I.

The Plastic Aztecs’ Grow continues at Beep Beep Gallery through April 7.


Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

Category: Reviews |
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  • Britney E.

    a very thoughtful and well-intentioned critique!

  • http://thoughtmarker.net Mike

    I’m curious as to what people thought of this show. It was obviously very creative and really fun to look at, but ultimately I felt it was a little sloppy and probably could have been a little more cohesive. I think that conceptually though, all of the Plastic Aztecs work is a step beyond most art that you would compare it to.

  • http://www.aieou.com Kombo

    I can’t think of many local collectives that I look forward to seeing as much as PA. I can understand why Mike says they could do with more cohesion, there’s usually a wide range of quality in their shows. I like the show, but I think I could have loved it. ‘Less is more’ may apply in this instance. The opening was a wash for me: Beep Beep’s very small, and it got a little claustrophobic once a lot of people filled the space. I’m gonna go back and see how I like it without my neighbor’s boob in my ear. They may want to consider some sort of crowd control policy, seriously. I think the core idea of living art that grows is fantastic and could be even further distilled, such is the burden of raised expectations.

  • http://www.danielosborne.info Dan

    Very forceful writing and though I haven’t been able to see the show, I think it is important to discuss the work that shows in low brow galleries like Beep Beep as fine art. I see it as ‘raising the bar’ for the artists who show there and as a reminder of a global art dialogue in which these shows are actually participants.

    A successful point of the article was in making me consider being part of a generation, which to a certain extent dictates the style and symbols, and my practice as an artist being to respond to the norms created by my generation. As a piece of street art in Brooklyn that I recently saw read: “One must fully grasp one’s icons to clasm one’s icons.”

    Situating Atlanta itself, too, as actually in the world of art is something I haven’t read in the critical art analysis going on there; but is a practice that could be valuable to the city. It’s a way of thinking that I can’t recall signs of in Athens either (where I live and attend UGA’s art school) except from two art scholars who spoke in the school of art: Robert Storr and Dave Hickey; or in Atlanta except hearing Stuart Horodner from the Contemporary.

  • http://www.ktauches.com ktauches

    I think low-brow artists have the potential to do more radical things than artists entrenched in the professionalized art systems. This is particularly true during this economic recession which serves a reality check for the sometimes bloated practices of fine art. . .

    the situation presents an opportunity for local art movements. . .but if the low-browsers do not practice critical thinking and avant-guarde risk taking as well as continuing prolific practices, making wild use of freedom of creativity. . .they will just continue to proliferate the pejorative stereotyping received from the higher echelons of art.

  • eggtooth

    Speaking locally-there is no higher echelon. Anymore than there is a lowbrow.Or even sign of the spirit that inspired either. is almost inspiring. as you’ve told me, makes for a great place to practice where you can do no wrong and take chances. and just have fun. (until the money runs out)
    Presently,our soil cannot actually support (with memory or impression)roots of strong or weak work. this is not even considering the economic environment, that as a factor tends to inspire more chance taking and unified raw expression,ja?
    a reason for the barren soil is still with the critical application of expectations. wld make us get to know each other,on one level. that investment also cld help create and define… perhaps the very culture of this city. As it stands right now, b.a. c.l. e.d. p.a…blah blah blah nobody cares. well, we do..but who are we. and then who is they.
    If you want to push/challenge pa,then lovely cookies, you shld ignore them. Be critical of work that has a point of relevance. If yr interest is in establishing a serious/cultured valued context to the work. for whats sacred in art. as well as for freaking sales. be tough on work that is a success in its failure because that way you can bring up the important issue as well as the fact that it is being raped within/throughout.

    examples: fahamu, flux (bloom), todd murphy, commissioned graffit. locally this is very important. issues/themes are not addressed or respected but used. very atl to date. the safety and sense of proper is really quite silly. debunks itself.

    this blog is good for what jerry had been crying for,it is growing strong as a go to place for simple awareness of ourselves and events.go ahead and review movies while yr at it. list showtimes etc… its comment section is like graffiti,tho.i like that.

    the general feel of ba.the critical voices seem pedestrian and colloquial for the most part.the pa review was fish in a barrel.
    (i liked ciliberto’s)
    on the one hand is fine and fun that the attempts at criticism are so casual,i enjoy being a performative critic. but sometimes it just seems like what cathy called “snarky & blithe”. which in a way i am also a fan of..but yr need is to cover cover cover. a sense of obligation exists. is very felt. to be professional,partner up with bigger entities, maybe even incorporate, sell ads etc…i suppose you actually represent a tradition that needs to be successful in that model of the old idea of the mainstream. so there can actually be that old idea of lowbrow.hmm. seems like yr trying to play both sides of the fence and getting neither. and its fine because in the meantime it gets you a temporary sense of affirmation. but actually invests in nothing. simply takes. but honestly means well. and all that fun stuff.

  • http://www.ktauches.com ktauches

    well, eggtoothian. . .thanks for the response. . .big issues for us out here “in the provinces” as I saw it referred to recently. (I prefer to say we all practice art in the suburbs, a plane ride away from the determining art centers) . . .I contend that the suburbs are not all that uninteresting afterall. . .weird and unpopular as they are. the slums have been known to be ripe vineyards of creativity.

    I disagree with you that there is neither a local low-brow nor an upper echelon of art. hello. we indeed have both and they rarely communicate or share space. they rather humorously don’t want association with each other. (High Museum & the Conteporary vs. Mint, Beep, Beep, etc.)

    I grew up in the low brow scene of my day. there were pressures to be un-intellectual, unambitious, cute and popular–to have a crowd at a show. meanwhile, the local heads of criticism pretty much ignored our efforts, seeing as we did not graduate from Yale or CalArts. . .it may be that those trying to gain acceptance from a broader contemporary art scene, were embarrassed to be associated with our “art.” but it also may be that a good bit of it was terrible and ignorant. . .some other of it was inspired and out in left field, but scruffy and low-budget. either way, we were invisible, but free. I always thought that was a great position from which to operate if we were ever going to graduate to more serious art-making.

    you paint my words as pollyanna-ish. perhaps you’re right (I guess I deserve that as I’ve called so many others by that name). I would love it if BA were more cutting edge, more about art theory and philosophy. . .but in truth it serves our community much better if we remain practically focused on criticizing, “casually,” the middle realms of art and offer really good global examples. how will our wild low-browsers mature into wild, but independent artists worth our respect? How will middle practitioners save face if they remain local? and, then how will the higher ups with potential support believe in the art that happens here indigenously? it will only happen if a.) we make better art, taking more risks and putting more heart into it and b.) think critically about it. . .outloud.

    one final thing. . .I like that BA is “casual,” it’s an alternative approach to the didactic authoritarianism of traditional criticism, which can really be full of hot air. here we are trying to start a conversation, not claim righteous finality. but I join you in my hope that BA will grow bolder, and sharper. . .maybe in time.

  • eggtooth

    think you kinda cant help but by that very statement, be claiming a sort of righteous finality of its own…
    wasnt painting yr words pollyanna-ish. was more reacting to the general feel i get from BA. i like yr words. they are as wild and intuitive and 300% as they can and need to be. with that comes what comes with it.

    on lack of communicating or sharing space relations, i dont disagree that they’ve defined an illusion between each other that is consistent.
    both walk like and talk like. neither actually commands the kind of idea they are proposing. and that is just it. it isnt relaxing or taking chances. its playing it safe and trying to …make some use of the giant illusionary leech. which is what BA is doing….its obligations are fundamental. which is logical for a business.

    still think the best treatment is etiolating. a sort of ignoring on one level while at same time being very intimate on another.that rot- if defined and accepted and clarifed as such,will erode and become fertile.is an honest thing..is an investment cuz it cares very effing much.

  • druther

    I think the T-shirts on the back wall belong to the gallery.