3

Marcel Breuer at Central Library and Museum of Design Atlanta

Written By Karen Tauches on December 10, 2009 in featured, Reviews

ATLFultonLibrary_centralstaircase

Marcel Breuer's Atlanta Central Library: Relic or refuse? Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons.

Modernist buildings in Atlanta have a proclivity towards neglect and disappearance. At a moment of political unrest over a famous Brutalist building, the Museum of Design Atlanta (MODA) hosts a beautifully designed traveling show about renowned architect Marcel Breuer, whose last great building happens to be our Atlanta Central Library. The museum reaches out to educate the public about a local architectural gem by presenting the expansive career of an international master. But can this show’s subtle activism change the minds of Atlantans?

breuer-show

A view of the current Breuer exhibition. Photo courtesy the Museum of Design Atlanta.

ATLFultonLibrary_front-view

The Central Library is located on One Margaret Mitchell Square. Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons.

The Central Library’s an avant-garde, concrete block building from the 1970s whose monumentality is tucked away on a somewhat obscure downtown side street. Perhaps it would be better understood in a more open space. It’s hardly a tourist destination like Rem Koolhaas’s glassy Seattle Public Library, which is the 21st century library du jour. The Central Library’s main patrons are the homeless who can’t afford a computer, or who just need somewhere warm to rest. Other patrons include art students looking to sample the retro graphics of the library’s awesome collection of books from the 70s and 80s. The security desk, stale air, and homey display cases at the entrance are more reminiscent of a juvenile prison than an inspiring city information center. The realities of its daily use, location, and culture seem cruel; it’s easy to imagine why this dinosaur is so unpopular with the mainstream. What’s worse, the library has been largely forgotten by residents that would most appreciate designer architecture. As city officials decide the fate of Breuer’s building, the architecture community has tried to reignite appreciation for the original design and its creator.

whitneyVS-ATLlibrary

Comparative displays juxtapose buildings such as the Whitney Museum of American Art (left) and Breuer's Central Library (right). Photo courtesy they Museum of Design Atlanta.

Half of the show is installed at MODA and focuses on Breuer’s furniture design and residential architecture. The other half is located at the Central Library and focuses on buildings and churches. Design motifs are clearly defined and consistent in both venues: bright orange-red panels, exquisite cantilevered metal vitrines, large black and white portraits of Breuer, and lovely white architectural models with accompanying blueprints that pull out from the side. The displays were “prepackaged” by the Vitra Design Museum in Germany in clear reverence of Breuer’s work. But—alas!–if only MODA could add a few site-specific details, the show might better reach out to the mainstream.

Ga-archives-blding

The Georgia Archives on Capitol Ave. Photo courtesy the New Georgia Encyclopedia.

In particular, I really wish that the timeline of Breuer’s career at the front of both venues had included this bolded insertion: Atlanta Central Library, built 1977. The building was originally commissioned by members of the library’s board, and it specifically aspired to the excellence of Breuer’s pinnacle accomplishment, the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York City. In the current exhibit, models of those two buildings are artfully placed side by side: There’s no doubt that they’re sisters. Through its focus on Breuer’s innovations in volume and space, this section of the exhibition inspires the intellectual as well as the aesthete.

For instance, the spaceship-like, concrete Begrisch Hall at NYU sits atop a soft hill. Students see the triangular volume of two balanced lecture halls lifted in the air as they approach the building. In the display of Breuer’s churches, we then see the architect open up the previously blocky buildings. This is a key to understanding the formalism of Breuer’s architecture: He wished to protect and define the specific physicality of spaces from the exterior. Not unlike the old Georgia Archives Building, built in 1965 by A. Thomas Bradbury, our Central Library is stylistically historic — and is an appropriate symbol for the disappearing age of material information. It is in these designs that Breuer’s use of space is most uncompromised.

dwntown-publiclibraryLO

This was the library demolished to make way for Breuer's Central Library. Postcard from Karen Tauches' personal collection.

After the rejection of yet another downtown library building, a pattern has emerged. (Note the image, to the left, of the building that was demolished to build the Breuer library). During his term as Public Library Director in the 1970s, Carlton Rochell was eager to have “a world class building.” He said, “ If you want a home run, you pick Hank Aaron.” And so they picked one in Marcel Breuer. In a more recent echo, current Fulton County Commissioner Rob Pitts rejected the previous home run, stating, “We need a facility that is … spectacular, world-class … something that will have a lot of pop, and you’ll go, ‘Wow! Look at that—that’s Atlanta.” An $85 million bond referendum passed last November. Pitts hopes to incorporate the library into a retail, dining, and performance space–a high-visibility central library property. But can we afford to buy another piece of designer architecture, when we already have one that’s considered a masterpiece?

I encourage everyone to see the show and make up your own mind as to whether we should preserve this Modernist landmark. Even if you don’t care for the cast-cement megaliths of the 70s, it’s definitely worth the effort to find parking downtown and visit both locations. And even if you don’t care for the politics, it will make your heart swell with pride for this deliciously passé building. As with fashion preferences for skirt lengths, tastes in architecture change in cycles. It would be a civic blunder to let ’em tear it down without proper consideration!


UPCOMING LECTURES

MONDAY, DECEMBER 14

John Poros The Atlanta Central Library: The End of a Long Search
Central Public Library, Auditorium / 6PM

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 13

Barry Bergdoll Marcel Breuer and the Invention of Heavy Lightness: From the Bauhaus to Atlanta
Central Public Library, Auditorium / 7PM


Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

Category: featured, Reviews |
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Dharil

    Good god, can Atlanta do ANYthing in the public space that doesn’t include “retail, dining, and performance space”. This corny boosterism has been going on at least since the days of Andy Young and simply makes the city seem like some magnolia-crusted Topeka, assuming that shopping equals culture. City pooh-bahs could, if they had any degree of respect for the history of the town, understand that they could turn the library into a source of pride. Instead, they’ll opt for some showy bit of au courant fluff (which will inevitably become “obsolete” in thirty years if the past is any indicator), have Home Depot or the like put logos all over it, and declare it “symbolic of Atlanta’s energy and outlook towards the future”.

    I left Atlanta over twenty years ago, in part to get away from this kind of puny civic behavior. It appears it wasn’t a mistake.

  • http://www.ktauches.com ktauches

    thank god for the economic downturn! for it may just save this building from destruction.

    ATL central library is a personal favorite! then again, I love 70s architecture. . . but regardless of personal tastes, I think that there should be a rule that anything built at a certain price range, especially commercial, has to stay standing for 50 years without judgement. (instead of the reverse. . .preservationists say a building must stand for 50 years, before it’s protected) it is only the test of time which determines architecture’s worth. a building, like a logo design–thought the stakes are a lot higher– has to make it through it’s first cultural rejection.

    Atlanta in particular is so insecure about who we are to the outside, we are not willing to wade through decades of outdated architecture. . .and yet that is exactly what makes a city great–diversity of style. A great counterpoint is Birmingham, Alabama: 1915 buildings sit next to high Modern mini-scrapers, next to wonky geometric 70s shapes. It’s amazing to behold and a treasure for the city’s future. each phase of fashion in architecture marks a phase and flavor of development. this is significant.

    to test the 50 years’ protection rule, I try to think. . .well, all those big box buldings, all those post apartment style, live-work condos which I abore. . .we should have to protect them, too. for they are a big part of our development history. I try to imagine how they might age and be altered into something cool. we’ve produced so many of them. maybe instead of tearing them down, we can change their surfaces. . .which ultimately are a more temporary element. instead of all that sheepish beige, in the future they are repainted in solid royal blue or black. . .maybe all the trees and shrubbery will grow to cover the uptight retro-brick fronts : )

    one can only dream. . .

    -kt

  • http://www.myspace.com/526067581 Crysta Kempinski

    Great design could be great by some, but to some others, it’s rubbish. Trust us, we now have suffered our share of varying opinions on our very own design work…