11

Scott Silvey: Civic Remedies at Whitespace

Written By Karen Tauches on May 28, 2009 in Reviews

silv

Scott Silvey, Lemon Balm.

Scott Silvey’s small body of work titled Civic Remedies: New Paintings from Tokyo, now showing at Whitespace Gallery, comprises maniacally consistent, well-made, illustrated landscapes. Dominating the center of nearly every composition are whitened, almost ghostly structures of modern Asian-esque architecture. But our view of these buildings is obscured by the expansion of flowering weeds, which emerge unemotionally from empty urban lots in the foreground. Their peaceful, decorative demeanor disarms the paintings’ content: a classic conflict between nature and the built environment.

Scott Silvey

Scott Silvey, Feverfew.

Silvey’s careful to make a fiction of plain design. His choices of symbolism are not grandiose or even exotic, as we often expect from Japan; the landscapes do not possess the swift neon energy of commercialism, nor of a bustling populace. They are not scenes of destruction or of the Apocalypse, but of quiet leftover places. The “medicinal herbs” (as Silvey calls them) in the foreground are not aggressive, and yet they conquer and dominate our view with their colorful sweetness. A certain quiet healing is taking place, suggesting a natural process that invites our empathy without becoming anthropomorphized—a radical notion for a metropolis where every crevice is packed with human development.

Vending

A Japanese vending machine.

Curiously, vending machines also play a role in Silvey’s symbolism. And, in several paintings, an electrical box sits humorously at the edge of an urban field. When I asked Silvey about this, he said, “Vending machines are everywhere in Toyko.” (Silvey now lives in Japan.) Mounds of dirt are yet another recurring image—a Silvey-ian trope I recognize from previous artwork he made when he lived and practiced in Atlanta seven years ago.

Stylistically, the quality of Silvey’s illustration seems retro; there is no shortage of detail—a viewer can walk right up to the surface of the works and still get a lot out of it. (This is the sort of intimacy of line and color I can sometimes find in a used children’s book when I “luck out” at the thrift store.) Silvey’s controlled palette is a nice break from the graphic “bling” we tend to see a lot lately in contemporary art.

Scott Silvey

Scott Silvey, Fern.

And the exhibition space helps a great deal to bring character to the illustrations. An antithesis of its name, Whitespace is relatively moody and damp for a commercial gallery. Silvey’s thin paint achieves a look of stained or weathered wood. Had he shown in the typical all-white gallery environment, the works would have seemed earthier by contrast. But instead, the sparse placement, dark brown walls, and brick floor help to create an atmospheric context. And, of course, this aspect of the show could have been pushed further with edgier curation. I especially liked the minimal layout in the second gallery, where three paintings seem almost illuminated by their pink sunset backgrounds, and are grouped nicely together at the far edge of a dark wall.

Scott Silvey

Scott Silvey, Betany.

My only disappointment was the absence of an actual plant element, especially since I know Silvey has the full capacity to create sculpture and conceptual installations. I could imagine, for instance, that the inclusion of glass terrariums and/or engineered humidity would help complete and ground Civic Remedies and the fantasy of a plant take-over presented in its images.

Civic Remedies: New Paintings from Tokyo will be on view at Whitespace through July 3.


Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

Category: Reviews |
Tags: , , , , , ,

  • http://www.myartspace.com/scottsilvey/ Scott Silvey

    Hello Karen,

    Thank you for your insightful review. I too would have liked to add a sculptural element to the work but unfortunately the lack of studio space to make sculpture in Tokyo as well as the cost of shipping made this an impossibility. However, it is my desire to create a sculptural version of “Civic Remedies” when life permits.

    Also, the exhibition runs through July 3 not June 2.

    Thanks again for your thoughts.

    Scott

  • Jeremy Abernathy

    The date mishap was my fault. The review now reads “July 3.” Thanks!!

  • Pingback: To Do List | BurnAway.org

  • http://www.myartspace.com/scottsilvey/ Scott Silvey

    Thank you for the correction.

  • eggtooth

    After reading this, I was further inspired to see the show. Now that I am back from seeing it and have read this review of yours again,i enjoy this. You manage to come at it from several angles and clearly present some interesting/thought-provoking observations. The review is often close to the work as well as maintaining a distance.
    Mentioning the context,the atmosphere whitespace provides and contrasting it is interesting for the sake of whitespace. There is something special about whitespace.
    I’m curious about manners of criticism. In yours there is an element of desiring for more,of expressing possibilites. Of considering what it is and what it is not. How far to go with that? If the notion is truly wanting to see the artistic vision fleshed out,be that based on prior knowledge of the artist’s work or keeping it specific to this particular show,the question is about a duty to the art.Having the will to honestly do what needs to be done. I mean..one cld go ahead and ask him to do an installation in an abandoned area of town,or faux finish the exterior of a building and plant metal plants in the yard etc…i dont know about creating or waiting on a pink/purple sky,but that’s not our problem… perhaps you see what i mean.
    Critical perspective is also effective in simply having the will to take what you see and essentially make it your own. Disregarding the artists intentions…? to a certain extent this is unavoidable anyways..yr writing about YOUR experience..right?
    I’m almost tempted to say that what you are saying without saying it as that this show cut off its nose. It became more concerned with just being-maybe being pretty? than actually saying something. I see his practicalities written about above…but part of me says “who cares?” -strictly speaking…that side of the issue is not our concern,so in a way,his will to acknowledge an undestanding of your view was almost admitting that he just kinda threw something on the wall for us. or did the best he could.
    i think i will submit some of my partially developed work to whitespace now- and make that be the theme of my show-thereby completing the show for me in some conceptual manner,one that contains it and validates it. the nature of expectations. i will call it: artistic remedies(they grow on you)

  • guywithapearlearring

    I wish I could actually SEE these pieces, touch them (or at least get close enough to imagine their feeling beneath my fingertips). Unfortunately, I’m in California and not likely to travel to Atlanta any time soon. This is the beauty of The Web — to be exposed to wonderful new voices and creators. The downside is that it’s a poor facsimile for the real thing. So, when I run across an artist like Scott Silvey and his Artspace page, I try to soak up what I can from those facsimiles. His work moves me, and I wish I could say it was within my means to view it first-hand, let alone buy a piece someday. So, after much digression, I come to my point — it’s tough to be a lover of art from a far. Even more difficult is trying to piece together the disparate reviews (both bad and good) that are out there. Because that’s how I, and many like me, shape our views on art — we read what others have to say about it, since most of us cannot afford to travel the world to see it all first-hand. And so I, being a lover of Silvey’s work, am an avid collector of his reviews since I cannot collect the actual works. And this has led me to be puzzled by a comment by the person going under the handle of EGTOOTH above. I am puzzled because his blurb here seems quite negative in tone. I have no problem with this. However, this same EGGTOOTH also must have posted nearly polar opposite comments on this page:
    http://everythingburnsaway.blogspot.com/2009/05/scott-silvey-whitespace.html

    When I read both, it gets me wondering — how many people out there who review art do so because of a love for creation as opposed to a need to destroy so that they might be heard?

    And so I ask myself “what does Eggtooth really think about this show?” This is an important question in so much as we all need to consider our responsibility as reviewers. Otherwise the shared knowledge of a community loses it cache, and we are left even more alone out here in cyberspace.

  • eggtooth

    I find your relationship with art via the internet interesting. That in itself is a topic worthy of many words. It adds layer(s) to the experience.
    Karen’s writing above considers the environment of Whitespace and what possible perception this helps create. It considers the possibility of entirely different feelings or interpretations of the work. What if it were in another gallery? One could also consider the entire city that Whitespace is positioned in,not just other colored walls etc…
    But your experience is the internet. A strange one. It is both a bigger frame of reference and a smaller one. The internet unavoidably takes alone to the liminal extent of alone-ness. There’s also the work itself that ultimately stands alone. And then everything between. The raw physicality of it. This is interesting,because in many ways this is not different from real-time. And yet it is a mimic. But now I take my turn digressing….

    My writing here was more responding to the review and the comment that the artist made.
    The writing on my blog was trying to react more directly to the work itself.
    I’m glad you noticed the differences. I was aware of the possible interpretations. On a local level, this consolidates and brings to the front a symbolic example of a phenomenon that exists in our city. What does anyone really think? How willing are they to passionately and Consistantly display that? and how? Buying? Writing? Talking? Creating…together?
    In terms of the internet experience, I’m glad it makes you think about your perception of shared knowledge,of a community- and being alone. The internet is…

    If I have shown a desire to destroy (which I don’t feel I have),it would be more in hopes to reveal a regenerative process. The deadheading of a flower is an analogy. I love creation.

  • Pingback: Scott Silvey at Whitespace « throw sheet

  • Jerry Cullum

    Lovely exchanges of views, which I’ve just now got round to reading. As far as submitting unfinished work to Whitespace, that is what most artists do…getting the show in a gallery schedule as at, say, Callanwolde typically gives them a year, and an incentive, to finish all the stuff sitting round the studio, plus begin those works they’ve been putting off starting…and of course there have been a major number of shows in which the incompletion was part of the point, interruption or impossibility being the concept. (My dentist, who offers the opinion that if anything has “art” in its name, it isn’t—installation art, conceptual art, digital art, performance art—would of course point out that this is a great excuse for not getting one’s act together. But Silvey, of course, not only got his act together, he spent a few thousand dollars he could ill afford to transport the act from Tokyo to Atlanta.)

  • eggtooth

    Limitations & obstacles are not my business. Any more than-to a certain extent- the intentions. Or expressions of future executable ideas. With all that being said:

    I thought the show was beautiful.

    I also find Whitespace/Whitespec to be one of the most appealing spaces for experiencing gallery art in Atlanta. I love everything about the place.

    thoughts: Researching intentions for continued considerings of art…especially as it goes for writing about how one feels about the art.
    Let’s say for the sake of argument that: Everything about a person going into an experience “As They Are”- is the purest. That is where the true reaction comes from! A person’s Feelers can miss or not “catch” -or even “misinterpret”-based on numerous reasons that are individuated and are what make people who they are. Even if in some cases those feelers are not feeling because of apathy or a mood that day,or ignorance to a topic.
    How far beyond that initial purity- is “beyond that” ? When does research become something outside of the reaction? Outside of the experience?
    One could say that “as they are” includes the desire to research. There are also artists who create work that is designed to make someone want to,need to- research…to learn,to grow, to change….. but, aah.and uuugh.
    intentions mean nothing.
    Right?
    then somewhere along the way a pen hits paper- sometimes..or i mean, fingers hit a keyboard.
    I guess what im wondering is if our fundamental identities are a solid thing from perhaps even prior to birth-one that only can Seem to shift and change like a layered fleshy masticating veneer -as we grow and learn. grow and learn to do what? adapt? survive? camouflage? make money?
    blech.
    i once saw an albino alligator in captivity and was told that in the wild it would have been killed by other gators or critters a long time ago. I thought the pool it was in looked pretty small.

  • http://www.ktauches.com ktauches

    well, I wanted to add this point.

    I said that this show had the potential to be more powerful with three dimensionality added to the environment. . .And, this is where the curation fell short. The burden of this criticism is not necessarily on silvey’s choice to show 2-d work.

    The drama of this concept (civil rememdies) could have been furthered with the inclusion, for instance, of one other person’s work, or a carefully selected additional element (making use of some local realm adjacent to art : florists, environmentalist, eco-farmers, squatters, landscape architects, collectors of old farm equipment, lovers of empty lots, terrarium makers, geologists, etc).

    A stronger curation could have turned this into a much more memorable show, and not just a display of fine art merchandise.

    -kt