14

Crop Circles, Cosmograms, Psychogeographies at Eyedrum

Written By Jeremy Abernathy on November 20, 2008 in Photo Tours

Brian Hitselberger, Constancy

If Eyedrum‘s current 20-artist group show, “Crop Circles, Cosmograms, Psychogeographies” aims at eclecticism, it certainly achieves it. In an unlikely gambit, a disparate range of styles are united by an equally broad, multi-part theme loosely inspired by UFOs.

Vandorn Hinnart, Elements*

Thankfully, the show comes with a catalog (funded by the Andy Warhol Foundation) to help put each work into context. Vandorn Hinnart’s Elements, for example, cites classical geometry, Platonic solids, and the golden mean. The piece may lack the pizazz of other works, but it fills its floor-to-ceiling space with an assertive, elegant confidence.

Brother Boko, Various Works

Compare Hinnart’s entry to these black light designs by Charles Freeman, aka Brother Boko. Welcome to the Epilepsy Room!

You just put these things on…*

While I’m sure the panel at left is, stylistically, an interpretation of the Chinese I Ching, Boko’s op art designs are allegedly based on “real” crop circles. The statement seems doubtful, on more than one level, but hey, why not?

And voila!

The setup embraces a kind of carnivalesque fancy that, by inviting the viewer to put on some goofy 3D specs, gives us a moment to drop our guard. I spent a lot more time in this room than I thought I would. The glasses really do add a nice effect, which of course, you can’t capture with a hand-held camera.

Katy Malone, Introduced Electromagnetism and the Correlation between UFO Sightings in a Site with Pre-existing Phenomena-inducing Components

And then we plunge deeper into the world of pseudoscience. I wasn’t present for the demonstration, but these vertical poles are fully functional, homemade electromagnets.

Katy Malone, continued.

Identifying herself as both an artist and a trained scientist, Katy Malone sets up an experiment to study the effects of electromagnetism on “the probability of UFO sightings.” Digital screens monitor Eyedrum’s exterior, while tablets of data document air conditions and other variables on-site.

Her method attempts an “undecidable” stance—between a serious interest in the unknown and an ironic skepticism towards the quackery common to UFO studies. She writes:

As a trained scientist I take issue with the methodology of these studies. The papers, reflective of the author’s obsession, rarely leave room for the original hypothesis to be disproved . . . Nevertheless, the sheer passion and intricate work put into the ‘research’ cannot be denied, and that is what fascinates me—the fine line between true scientific pursuit and the overwhelming desire to prove a belief that comes out of sheer faith.

This was one of my favorites, but I wonder if there’s a way to, physically, flesh out the concept a little more.

Tom Zarilli, I Still Dream of the Canal Zone

Other pieces interpret themes peripheral to crop circles, including a circle as a map of a psychological interior. Visually, Tom Zarilli’s bed plays with the viewer, enticing us to invade the artist’s privacy and experience his childhood recollection. Here’s an excerpt from his statement:

We are displaced by the memories and icons of locales of the past melded into our current understanding. I grew up in the Panama Canal Zone, a political entity that is now non-existent. Since leaving there over 40 years ago, I have been haunted by dreams of still being there.

The installation incorporates vintage maps, a decoy iguana, and children’s book paraphernalia reminiscent of “story time” at the local library. The puzzle invites us to peer underneath and from all sides.

Brian Hitselberger, Constancy (detail)

Brian Hitselberger’s piece uses the metaphor of “navigating by the stars” to illustrate the process of getting through a rough time in life. It reminds me of the “Flat Earth woodcut,” which despite its look, may have been completed in the 19th century and not the 12th.

These more personal pieces succeed by transmitting the show’s nebulous theme through lived experience, effectively bringing the discussion back “down to Earth.”

Gold by David Lynch (not the director)*

Other works, which unfortunately include most of the two-dimensional images, take a more literal route. This piece by David Lynch struggles in too many directions at once. “Crop Circles” seems hindered by the urge towards mysticism, at times waxing the more speculative realms of New Age. Sometimes “eccentric” does not equal “deep.”

Sean Beeching, The Minatory Zodiac*

Sean Beeching, continued*

But then Sean Beeching saves us with humor. These vaguely Japanese panels form a fortune telling system called The Minatory Zodiac. No matter which “sign” the spinning wheel chooses, your fortune is unsavory at best. The tongue-in-cheek captions were a nice addition.

Anne Cox, Whorl Force Above Katrina

The Minatory Zodiac connects to Anne Cox’s tribute to the spirit of New Orleans in the face of disaster. As the catalog informs us, the etymology for “disaster” is linked to the idea of a “bad star.”

Anne Cox (detail)*

Fortunately, there’s enough substance here to balance the many competing drives, elevating the whole out of a virtual schizophrenia. “Crop Circles” pulls off an entertaining and surprisingly thoughtful variety show.

* Photos marked with an asterisk were taken by Ben Grad. “Crop Circles, Cosmograms, Psychogeographies” will continue in Eyedrum’s main gallery until Sat. Nov. 29.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

Category: Photo Tours |
Tags: , ,

  • nami

    Misuse of the term “schizophrenia.” Please do some research about the disease.

  • Jeremy Abernathy

    Yeah, it is inaccurate. I was going for the sound of the word, and plus I don’t mean to use the word literally, as if someone had an actual disease.

  • http://ridebikes.wordpress.com/ robert ashton

    wow this looks like a great show

  • Ben Grad

    Yeah, definitely great – and it goes really well with the Plastic Aztec exhibit in the small gallery.

  • http://www.circlemakers.org Rob Irving

    “Thankfully, the show comes with a catalog (funded by the Andy Warhol Foundation) to help put each work into context.”

    Where can I get one of those?

  • http://myinclementweather.com Brian Hitselberger

    Thanks for the review guys!

  • http://www.myspace.com/annecoxart Anne Cox

    i love it jeremy.
    & thanks for seeing to our show

    your pictures of the zodiac and the brother boko 3D room let me relive two of my most hilarious moments at the crop circles opening

    good fun

    we can avoid that bad star for a moment right?

  • Jeremy Abernathy

    Rob,

    You can contact Robert Cheatham, the curator, directly:

    zeug1@earthlink.net

    or he says you can visit Eyedrum this Sunday (closing day, Nov. 30), and he or someone there will have copies of the catalog.

    : – )

  • http://www.circlemakers.org Rob Irving

    Thanks Jeremy,

    Much as I’d love to visit the gallery and see the show it’s going to be difficult as I live in the UK. I’ll contact Robert.

  • Nicholas O’Neal Blume

    I was an artist in the show and had a horrible experience in which my art was destroyed by an eyedrum board member and his friends, then I was assaulted by one of their friends with a broken bottle. I have never been fully compensated for the damages. I directed and built a interactive performance/installation for this show, the piece involved a $5,000 8ft tall water tank with clear walls that i used for live painting underwater symbolizing my baptism. After the show an eyedrum board member and his friends burned a sign that said do not touch then pissed in my art poured bleach and kerosene in it then took off all their clothes and went swimming in it. they started to drown so this other guy who rents a studio at the eyedrum smashes a hole in the tank. the repairs for the tank to make it like new are $1,000. In addition to that during the show one of my projector cords were stolen disabling one projector. I, know they are broke so i made a deal with them, if they cleaned the water tank and helped me patch and reseal it before my next show four weeks later then we would be even, but they were unable to meet all those requirements and the curator or board of eyedrum have done nothing to that board member who destroyed my art.

  • Ivan Nikolayevich Homeless

    Nicholas O’Neal Blume,

    Your use of abusive and misleading rhetoric does not become someone who considers themselves such a lofty artist. First off, airing grievances in response to a review of artwork. This article is about the artistic merit of the show not whether or not you or others were aggrieved in some fashion. Since it is not my place to discuss what did or did not happen to your so called piece of art and the relationship you have developed with Eyedrum I will instead focus on yourself as a self proclaimed artist.

    To present yourself as an artist rings about as true as Stomp and Stammer’s David T. Lindsay presenting himself as a film academic; you use vague simblances of what you assume to be art and pray that no one notices the significant lack of any substance. Your performance, in which you paraded this grand spectacle that you would set yourself on fire before plunging into the tank was insipid and pathetic. No only did you gather people around a good half hour before you actually began your piece but you were woefully unprepared, asking the patrons whether or not they had extra towels because you ruined the one that you had. The genereal consesus of the crowd during this buildup was not awed anticipation but rather a gallow’s humor of your self immolation. When you actually lit yourself on fire, a phrase which does not adequately describe the actual event as it would have been equally effective to attach a lit match with scotch tape to your forehead.

    Claiming some sort of symbolism to your doodling inside the water tank does not make it a legitimate piece of work. Instead of seeing some cathartic experience I saw more of a fat man swimming in a take, trying desperately to draw with oil pens on the inside of the glass (which I do believe you borrowed from another artist who did not know you were going to ruin them.) Frankly I find you boring and while I would prefer not to give you even an ode of credence it is a pet peeve of mine to let idiocy stand unopposed.

    Perhaps it is best that you did not enjoy your experience at Eyedrum. I hope you also don’t enjoy your experince at any other art gallery in this city or any other so that no one has to put up with what is a waste of valuable time. You do not make art, the only adequate word to describe your installation is boring. I think it says a lot when the only thing of interest about your piece is the supposed carnage it caused. Also, it is very telling that you were not mentioned once in the review.

    Sincerely,
    Ivan Nikolayevich Homeless

  • jane doe

    Dear Mr. Homeless,
    The last paragraph is a bit harsh and probably unnecessary!

    Yours truly,

    Jane

  • Us

    Not only did we piss in your pathetic tank, we shit in it as well. Given the opportunity, we would do it again.

  • http://rolandfisher132.blog.com/2009/10/15/learn-the-the-beauty-of-the-wreaths/ Doug Mast

    When I originally commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get four emails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove me from that service?Thanks